Wednesday, March 25, 2015

OM has “enough hard evidence” to extend detention Holleeder – NU.nl

Lawyer Holleeder Stijn Franken said Wednesday, after the intervention of the prosecutor, not to ask for release from custody.

This emerged during a pro forma session in the trial against Holleeder, where he is accused of involvement in the killings of criminal and real estate dealer Kees Houtman in 2005 and innkeeper Thomas van der Bijl in 2006.

The court decided to stay the proceedings for up to three months. The following pro forma session on 18 or 19th of June. Until then, the magistrate may hear witnesses.

The decision of the court means Holleeder provisionally in custody remains.

According to the prosecutor would be “a slap in the face of the relatives and society as Holleeder released pending his trial.”



‘Too early’

Holleeder and Franks decided not to ask for release Monday after new incriminating statements came at them. Franken asks Justice to “a complete dossier ‘and nine months to study it. Content he does not respond. He calls it “too early”.

Well Franken doubts about the indictment of the Public Prosecutor. Franks says that Holleeder not the instigator and can be co-perpetrator of the two liquidations where Holleeder of accused.

The court awaits the coming months what the OM still going to do to the indictment. For Franken means more room to consider the case.



Private

Holleeder Wednesday was present in court. However, he was shielded with black screens, so it is not visible to the public and the press.

The prosecution says Holleeder was shielded to prevent that he could make contact with the people in the stands.

Video: Holleeder shielded courtroom

<- block | video end -! ->

Criminal organization

Holleeder stands for justice for his possible involvement in the two criminal accounts. He is accused of involvement in a criminal organization.

That criminal organization, which according to the OM Holleeder, Dino S. Fred R., Jesse R. and constituted part of the liquidated Ali Akgün had to goal murder or incitement to murder. The OM hefty amounts were paid for the killings. Houtman and Van der Bijl would have been on a liquidation list of the organization.



Statements women

The officer reported that Monday as Tuesday was already known statements of sisters Holleeder Sonja and Astrid, and the widow of the murdered Sam Klepper in 2000, with whom Holleeder had a relationship, are added to the file.

The prosecution would be the statements of three women have been two years in the vault are

Video:. The prosecution of the witness statements

<- block |! video end ->

Enhance

Sister Astrid proposes in its statement that Holleeder ” if you’re not with him, you’re against him. ” “He destroys his own environment,” quotes the officer Wednesday.

According to the prosecution sketched ex Sandra den Hartog the image of “an aggressive and manipulative man who did not hesitate to threaten her and her children.”

According to the prosecution evidence against Holleeder consists mainly of testimony that match and reinforce each other.

The sisters and ex Holleeder would in declarations Holleeder include links to the murders of Houtman and Van der Bijl.

“If he (Houtman, ed.) Does not pay, I will shoot him dead,” said Holleeder would against ex Den Hartog. And sister Sonja Holleeder would have asked for a picture of Van der Bijl. Sister Astrid had stated his conviction that that picture was given to the murderers of Van der Bijl

. <- Block |! Slideshow start -> <- block |! Slideshow end ->

New witness

In addition to the statements of the three women are also the statements of the new witness of the prosecution, the Turkish drug dealer Hidir K. They go on cooperation between Holleeder and two other leaders of the criminal world: Dino S. and Stanley Hillis liquidated in 2011.

The prosecution said Wednesday that Dino S. and K. Holleeder ‘Blood Brothers’ is mentioned. Together the two, according to the statements of K since 2002 would have been a criminal duo.

The statement of K. closes according to the OM with previous testimonies include Willem Endstra and Thomas van der Bijl . Hitherto Holleeder always silent. Similarly Wednesday during the pro forma.



Van Hout, Endstra and Mieremet

From the various testimonies, including those of sister Astrid, would according to the public clearly that Holleeder also behind the assassinations of, among others criminal Cor van Hout in 2003, real estate dealer Willem Endstra in 2004 and criminal John Mieremet is in 2005.

The prosecution, however, is not over whether the Holleeder wants to prosecute for these liquidations .

Peter R. de Vries

Also, from the statements of Astrid Holleeder would appear that a gunman had arranged to crime reporter Peter R. de Vries to bring out. This is because De Vries had reported threats.

Holleeder was convicted last month for this case.



Passage Process

Meanwhile, also runs the appeal in the vast Passage Process, which revolves around a series of statements, including the assassinations of Houtman and Van der Bijl. What the prosecution is concerned, the criminal case against Holleeder handled separately. The prosecution, however, wants to prevent the witnesses in both cases “devastated heard”

Hollow managers long career felony

By:. NU.nl / Lindsay Mossink

LikeTweet

No comments:

Post a Comment