If the purchase tax on cars (bpm) is abolished, this is done at the earliest in 2017. Then a new car tax system in force. That says Paul de Waal of the association Bovag
.
The daily writes that Secretary of State Eric Wiebes (Finance) intends bpm gradually abolish. He wants as more and more buyers are trying to push the bpm by removing cars from abroad. The BPM system is very susceptible to fraud.
“That the bpm Wiebes off will is not new. He also said that last year. The system is a legal monstrosity that many burdensome and in Europe is not good, “says De Waal. The wait is kept in the Auto Letter 2, which Wiebes his plans for car tax from 2017 to 2020 unfolds. The letter is expected this summer. It is not just in it for the purchase tax, but also the motor vehicle tax, excise duties and the addition for company cars
—-
READ ALSO:. Car manufacturers are disturbed large differences in car taxation EU. Autovisie We spoke with Opel CEO Karl-Thomas Neumann on this.
—-
Furthermore, Wiebe has already warned that the new system ‘budget neutral’ will be said De Waal. Where the revenue decline on the one hand, they are so retrieved on the other side. That may mean that a new car is cheaper by the disappearance of the BPM, but it uses more expensive by raising the car tax
.
More Autovisie
So, the ordinary citizen will probably pay much more for it to particle is only for people who want to drive new
-
62 - 3
- Comment
The new way to cheat. Now do not pay people with money who buy a new car but have to pay the rest of motoring Netherlands so it will not be neutral but more profitable. And next year is not enough, so raise even more. Welcome to the firm trickery and deceit. They decide and we do not say. If you have chosen some say. So would it work if I tell my boss “you can choose I get 500 or 1,000 euros more pay. Does that work? Nope!
- 47
- 1
- Comment
own cigars
- 41
- 0
- Comment
Beginning ultimately not much cause! ” The dairy cow’m perfectly well stripped further, do not panic! One way or another heinous and exorbithant heavily taxed will remain the car at all times in this country full of political criminals!
- 42
- 0
- Comment
And there will motoring Netherlands better? Probably not. You bet on a further milking of the motorist.
- 42
- 0
- Comment
Geert Wilders purebred late as there are brands that civil charges are ZAT! Do something about it and let Kwiebus tripping over his own plans, if necessary through a referendum!
- 45
- 0
- Comment
and who are again screwed one who can buy a new car but have to pay more road tax, why not take away that is much fairer.
- 28
- 6
- Comment
Will pocket, pocket story. This cheaper, than more expensive so that tax revenues are the same / stay. Quite the revision of the tax system is a pocket, pocket story.
- 21
- 0
- Comment
The tax on new cars in the Netherlands is exponentially high. In contrast, the ex-factory prices of new vehicles for the Netherlands relatively laag.Anders are sold in the Netherlands, but few cars. Once, like eg. BPM is reduced or even disappear, the car manufacturers will increase their export prices to the Netherlands. In short, far from being budget neutral for the consumer because the NL government will increase the road tax to compensate for the lack of BPM.
- 16
- 1
- Comment
More scrabble practices from the Courtyard so. Are we not waiting. Everyone pays itself squint to various charges imposed by the state. Time for Robin Hood.
- 20
- 1
- Comment
What … the car tax even higher? And then in 2016 you would buy a new car, pay bpm, and the next year are faced with much higher tax. What, moreover, is a monster, because the money for it is not spent on infrastructure, but disappears into the bottomless staatsput. And moreover, it is in many other countries in the fuel price, which are also later. The government must once again learn to deal with money.
- 25
- 1
- Comment
Why do I feel … that we do NOT better?!?
- 27
- 0
- Comment
Yes, of course, the citizen can not be better we have to continue to fill the coffers to waste billions.
- 20
- 0
- Comment
Sure, throw the MRB but back up. so everyone, even the ones who can never pay for a new car, so paying for a deficit that is created by these so-called pundits in The Hague.
- 18
- 0
- Comment
‘budget neutral’ means once a thief always a thief
- 11
- 0
- Comment
It should once again” budget neutral “, where the compensation for the consumer remains for abolishing the Oldtimer Scheme?
- 4
- 1
- Comment
In other words, it is just another expensive for everyone! It is good that there is thought to environmentally but we’re not all the way through? I need for my Porsche 911 15 years old now capital to pay MRB? while only 2 times per month in the summer use that thing? Just watch my words! driving is a crime! And there are fewer and fewer are sold! BPM is prohibited by the European Court! 70% of automotive revenue already going into general funds! BAH!
- 11
- 0
- Comment
BPM is abolished when I’m old. And even when it is abolished will they invent a new tax in the Hague again. Are we Hague with their rules gradually not tired of?
- 11
- 0
- Comment
Boy, what a tsjonge guts to look that far ahead. Really, now a politician who is energetic !!
- 5
- 0
- Comment
in 2017! invent the men have something new !!
- 6
- 0
- Comment
Fortunately one Europe huh computing engine
- 9
- 1
- Comment
Let me guess ……. “it is different” actually means it gets more expensive.