Thursday, December 11, 2014

Chamber chooses changes corporation world – Telegraaf.nl

Chamber chooses changes corporation world – Telegraaf.nl

THE HAGUE –

The House on Thursday unanimously approved numerous changes in the corporation world. Who were also vital because there were several cases sharply out of hand at a number of corporations. There was no proper supervision and there were wild financial and commercial adventures entered

.

 Photo: Reuters

There’s only one independent supervisory authority. The position of tenants is improving. Corporations must limit themselves again as much as possible in their core business: managing and renting homes for people with little money

Recent residential Minister Stef Blok noted with concern because the need for the changes did not appear anywhere in corporation country. penetrated, but the new law will help, according to him that the cultural change there “between the ears” of the action.

The House voted for a proposal from the SP, which block calls to urge the corporation dome Aedes to send to the corporation bosses fall under a collective agreement. Block thinks his task and not the law on executive pay has been tightened. He is considering.

The new law closes for a large part on the recommendations of the Parliamentary Committee of Inquiry into Housing Associations who examined what went wrong in the corporation world. However, the committee wanted the corporations would be allowed to do absolutely nothing outside the core. Room and Minister alone to do so under strict conditions. It may be particularly disadvantaged and shrink areas, where market players have fancy. The tape in order to demonstrate that, being even less. President Roland van Vliet agreed vain along with a proposal of the PVV to still respond to the committee’s desire.

The income limit for social rented accommodation is widened in the law for five years. At that time may get some more houses are allocated to people who earn between 34,000 (the income) and 38,000 euros. The Labour Party wanted to give the middle more likely to affordable housing.

The cheapest houses in the sector to the people with the narrowest market, is also in the new law.


Write a comment

login

The content of this field is kept private and will not be made public.

11-12-2014, 17:08
Vriez (guest)

Will be back in favor of the grabbers are not tenants

  • 0
  • 0
  • test

11-12-2014, 16:53
Thijs80 (guest)

really everything VVD is to go to the knoppuh

  • 0
  • 0
  • test

11-12-2014, 16:52
Adrie Cattle (guest)

apron here and there still an enjoyment of what we have right on and we also pay for. People with fungi and the like, and nuisance are still many other things, that they must now once again going to solve, is also one of their key tasks.

  • 0
  • 0
  • test

image of kees Vandenburg
11-12-2014, 16:49
kees Vandenburg

limp story “as much as possible to interfere with core”? there should be “ONLY WITH CORE ENGAGED AND INTEGRITY DEALERSHIP” also friends with other services and trade associations must be broken auctions. so there must also clear wage agreements are imposed. and rents must be reduced annually instead of standard up, then maybe it is something in the Netherlands. then the government can be praised, now tentatively just yet!

  • 0
  • 0
  • test

image of jacobus1946
11-12-2014, 16:43
jacobus1946

If we now think that the grabbers cease to collect than we really wrong, this Zoodje occasional services other you do not.

  • 0
  • 0
  • test

11-12-2014, 16:38
J. van Dijk (guest)

If the somewhat higher incomes are also entitled to live there need fewer subsidies and less money circulated. But that would be too simple

  • 0
  • 0
  • test

11-12-2014, 16:38
Heman (guest)

And the almost criminal rent increases turning back !! But it will be just like the gasoline acijns higher more and more

  • 0
  • 0
  • test
11-12 -2014, 16:33
Mick64 (guest)

And of course Block defends the bosses, VVD aspires unhinged grabbers and criminals, since it is a hobby for them.

  • 0
  • 0
  • test

11-12-2014, 16:31
kevincoy (guest)

They have to go back to the core, but here in Utrecht be social rented housing sold by Mitros. And who sit there? Ex-councilor Swart of housing, and yes, Madame Vogelaar …. That kind competed for years with the sale of the interests of tenants. If we really want to make a clean sweep … stop selling social housing and the whole corrupt bobo gang kicking out. Preferably bring before the court.

  • 0
  • 0
  • test

image of stevan.nikolic.7121
11-12 -2014, 16:31
stevan.nikolic.7121

So keep patches up

  • 0
  • 0
  • test

image of rudolfientje1
11-12-2014, 16:30
rudolfientje1

Enter the first amendment that there should be no ex politicians who govern. That is ALWAYS wrong!

  • 0
  • 0
  • test

11-12-2014, 16:28
Don Cory (guest)

The politicians themselves are the biggest cheaters, because the corporations are created by powerful politicians. The Second Chamber decided every year rent increases, which is usually in election years lower than inflation and so make the rented actual loss. Politicians should not more but less interfere with rental properties. Then no longer a housing shortage would cease to exist, because there was enough built. Be enough cars built for everyone.

  • 0
  • 0
  • test

11-12-2014, 16:22
size luna (guest)

As long as they are not capable in The Hague, on the corporations will not change anything.

  • 0
  • 0
  • test

11-12-2014, 16:21
ReneC (guest)

Actually, the government holds no supervision. In the residential sector is not, in the banks and not in the care not. It is the hidden agenda of the VVD to keep fellow managers from the wind or to yourself wanting to get such a job. Is it wrong, then pay the citizen forever. Also at VROM played its dirty games but top rather flop officials should just stay put. The government is totally rotten.

  • 0
  • 0
  • test

11-12-2014, 16:20
JD Goedman (guest)

Take time salaries of directors and board members who aan.Breek if necessary contracts open and make sure it all at once anyway comes under the Balkenende norm, because if there is too long the people will dawdle meaning that in 2015 it gets even heavier, it myself aanpakken.Geen nepotism more and think they can play God, because that is absolutely ridiculous.

  • 0
  • 0
  • test

11-12-2014, 16:19
TWh (guest)

As usual with these snails government as it is bolted it dampens the well. We first show for millions defraud that tenants have to cough up and now they have an agreement. Am curious to fill the bags will just continue.

  • 0
  • 0
  • test

11-12-2014, 16:18
hpezp (guest)

And again a well-paid manhole cover. Hefty penalties with TBS, which really helps.

  • 0
  • 0
  • test

11-12-2014, 16:17
willem three (guest)

A rented house is not just for people with less cash, but think of the elderly people who wanted to live smaller. In short, there are many more reasons.

  • 0
  • 0
  • test

11-12-2014, 16:15
Janey (guest)

Does the one overseeing the fat bonuses then?

  • 0
  • 0
  • test

image of user-15949
11-12-2014, 16 : 13
Tineke

No additional supervision there also sets rules regarding salary, with consequences if one does not hold to this, one must adhere to just the core as it once was, supervised by the government, not a new umbrella organization that takes tons of money.

  • 0
  • 0
  • test

11-12-2014, 16:12
Ruud ng (Guest)

I do not see why a housing cooperative should do more than build affordable homes and verhuren..wijken keep livable is the responsibility of municipalities.

  • 0
  • 0
  • test

11-12-2014, 16:12
Zoerei (guest)

This is simply the knowledge, skill and integrity. And you have to keep politics and their vrindjes far from.

  • 0
  • 0
  • test

11-12-2014, 16:01
Eric booze (guest)

That minister Block is just a corrupt man. Given its function …

  • 0
  • 0
  • test

11-12-2014, 15:55
ger12 (guest)

Blah blah blah she drank a glass did a puddle and everything remained as it was. So a supervisor of the supervisors Hahahaha us knows us for the stage. They should think about 30 years earlier. The spots

  • 0
  • 0
  • test

11-12-2014, 15:53 ​​
Esmeralda (guest)

Is there also a change in the additional annual rent increase? Now sits as a single on the 710, – per month because 6.5% was thrown on top. Because the children still live at home and be counted. Studying and thereby have a job for their education. Joint household income? I do not have that money. My children have themselves necessary for the study and monthly expenses. src=”http://www.telegraaf.nl/wuz/sites/all/themes/zen/css/images/clear.gif” src=”http://www.telegraaf.nl/wuz/sites/all/themes/zen/css/images/clear.gif” src=”http://www.telegraaf.nl/wuz/sites/all/themes/zen/css/images/clear.gif” src=”http://www.telegraaf.nl/wuz/sites/all/themes/zen/css/images/clear.gif” src=”http://www.telegraaf.nl/wuz/sites/all/themes/zen/css/images/clear.gif”

LikeTweet

No comments:

Post a Comment