“A total breakdown of the trust of people, of pensions, of people, of werkperspectief,” said Dijsselboem in an interview with het Financieele Dagblad (FD).
Partly for this reason he thinks his interventions in the financial sector to defend. That he played as an activist is defined, seems to him a good title. “I think my concern is totally justified.”
He admits that his interference with the height of variable remuneration, a moral side knows, “but also a classic of the Labour party side: how do we keep everything together'. “That is a responsibility for the whole elite.”
Faith
Dijsselbloem says further against the FD that he is about populism, however, once discussions with the bankers and other ceo’s. “Then you see in their eyes: that is a matter for the politicians. But if you rely want to recover, you need to take a position in the social debate. Bankers are under the table, crept up, understandable due to the storm. But there comes a time that they there under should.”
In response to a question from the newspaper keeps Dijsselbloem open the possibility of himself ever in the financial sector to get started. “Never say never. But it is not my first passion. Moreover, I am in favour of a cooling off period of two years, which I certainly not in the financial sector will work.”
No comments:
Post a Comment