the witness interrogations of the sisters ran for summer solid, because the sisters invoke their privilege. That law have witnesses when they threaten to burden themselves or a family member with their statements. According to lawyers Robert Malewicz and Sander Janssen is due, however, that the law is violated due process Holleeder.

According Malewicz has Sonja Holleeder whether she stated truthfully answered that she ,, parts “did not do. She refused to explain which parts. The lawyers say that the sisters have a financial motive to want to give answers to questions from the defense.

The prosecution was Sonja Holleeder already signed a trade agreement that relates to the legacy of Van Hout . The prosecution does not want to add that document to the criminal file in the case of Willem Holleeder because content ,, concerns him no ball, “said prosecutor Sabine Tammes.

The process seems to end up in a deadlock come, because there is still an embargo on the statements Willem Holleeder sat earlier. That embargo he demanded in exchange for his statements because he does not want his sisters know what he said before he was able to ask them questions. Holleeder fears that his sisters and ex-girlfriend Sandra den Hartog will change their testimony when they find out what he has stated. It has under Tammes but also means that the research team could not go on verification and falsificatieonderzoek.

The defense thinks one accusation Holleeder now be able to refer to the realm of fiction. The charge that he murdered provoked by crime reporter Peter R. de Vries and his sister Sonja is, according to lawyers from the pen of a former detainee who had an interest in a transfer to another prison.

The court takes a decision on Tuesday include the request of the defense. Holleeder there will not be. It is that day heard as a witness in the liquidation process Passage