Despite the feitenrelaas that Wiebes Wednesday night to the Second Room sent, bounces, he Thursday, in the debate with the Room on mere furrowed brow. “How has it come this far? How could it be that no one the surgery? Why was the Room not being informed?" as fired a CDA-Member of parliament Omtzigt his questions on the secretary of state.
The christendemocraat points out that, eventually, 2700 officials 64 years of age and older of the scheme, may use “and all they have to take the top prize.” Just as D66 demands an investigation of the General Court of auditors to the scheme, which is also a disguised early retirement proved to be giving the taxman a hefty additional levy on themselves should impose. Total budget: 70 million euro.
D66 Member of parliament Of Weyenberg calls the whole course of business 'tarnished'. Also he is still full of questions. “How can the Tax administration of such a retirement scheme agree without the consent of the secretary of state?”, he wants to know. What the D66'concerns thus not only the Irs, now under guardianship, but also Wiebes themselves. He wants the secretary of state the Room from now on regularly be kept informed of the comings and goings at the treasury.
PVV’Van Dijck concludes that “this secretary of state is clearly not the director” had. “He trusted blindly on the control mechanisms and slept through all the alarm bells.” He calls it 'impossible to explain' to the people who obediently pay taxes. “Waste of taxpayers’ money by the minister of state taxes. This undermines the belastingmoraal and that is a mortal sin. The citizen gets a thick attack if he is a day late, but the Irs gives itself a gilt-edged EARLY retirement scheme."
The SP is still it must be investigated whether the vertrekdeal cannot be reversed. SP-Member of parliament, Bashir connect a motion of censure against the secretary of state.
No comments:
Post a Comment