According Dullaert it is strange that the Children’s Ombudsman for the nomination and appointment is subject to the National Ombudsman, whereas it is the duty of the Children’s Ombudsman to operate independently. Dullaert calls this relationship a “flaw in the law.”
“I am equal to the Ombudsman, but I am subordinate within the organization of the Ombudsman”, concludes Dullaert. According Dullaert “rubbing” it.
He argues, therefore, in a farewell interview with the NIS to return the appointment of the Children’s Ombudsman are in the evaluation of the law for Late summer is on the agenda.
Discussion
the House in the Netherlands is responsible for the appointment of the Children’s Ombudsman, but the selection and nomination of candidates is the responsibility of the National Ombudsman . The position of the Children’s Ombudsman in relation to the National Ombudsman has long been a point of discussion.
When it was announced that National Ombudsman Van Zutphen wants to restructure the organization of the Ombudsman and that there is thus no place would be more Dullaert, there was much unrest because Dullaert have liked to want to continue estimated. In response to his forced departure Dullaert received thousands of messages of support.
Dullaert says in the interview that the resulting noise was unnecessary and clumsy. He is also concerned about the independence of the Children’s Ombudsman in the future.
Temporary appointment
Despite the fact that the National Ombudsman Dullaert not want to rename Dullaert had offered a year to stay. That offer came according Dullaert from the fact that he wanted to finalize important files and because he is currently also President of the Children’s Ombudsman.
Van Zutphen declined the offer for the temporary appointment of one year. Dullaert now stop on April 1 as Children’s Ombudsman
It is not yet known who will succeed Dullaert
No comments:
Post a Comment