Tuesday, September 9, 2014

‘Raising state pension age in 2024 not necessary “- Telegraaf.nl

'Raising state pension age in 2024 not necessary "- Telegraaf.nl

UTRECHT –

New projections of life expectancy show that a further increase in the retirement age is not required in 2024. That enables the Royal Actuarial Society, the Dutch association of actuaries in its biennial estimate

.

Dutch are expected although aging says Chairman Jan Kars. But the rise in average life expectancy goes so far as predicted earlier. “There are no new setbacks.”

Boys who are born this year are expected to be 89.9 years. Girls even 92.2 years. In the previous forecast of two years ago, the life expectancy of newborns 86.5 and 87.1 years respectively. Was

More and higher pension age

retirement age from 2024 linked to life expectancy. Now people have two months after their 65th birthday entitled to AOW. That limit was gradually increased to 67 in 2023 years the government has a bill are ready to further accelerate, making the state pension age for 2021 opens on 67.

Pension funds and insurance process Using the predictions of the society in determining their premiums and coverage ratios. President Kars expected based on its new forecast no major changes in the facilities of most pension funds and insurance

.

More Retirement

class=”clear”

Write a comment

login

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown.

Image of harold-2006
09-09-2014, 20:17
harold-2006

Help youth and immigrants to work and let 65 year olds go AOW.

  • 109
  • 1
  • test

Image of pieter x
09-09-2014, 20:14
pieter x (guest)

2014 das far away as our heads are still not unwound and we took the then last cabinets like this degradation mess still alive, which I doubt

  • 52
  • 2
  • test

Image of saskia000
09-09-2014, 20:09
saskia000 (guest)

I do not believe that that man get older. with us here most people die for their 65 again today alone 61 years. So all that money they can keep beautiful. where do those people who sit in this trashy government come from? especially among the lower stone

  • 88
  • 3

  • test

Image of Matje
09-09-2014, 20:09
mat (guest)

All of those are not at all know how about the lives of the population in each other’s cabinet.

  • 79
  • 0
  • test

Image of Nico
09-09-2014, 20:06
Nico (guest)

40 years of work, thus contributing to the Netherlands BV is entitled to AOW. Nothing no age discrimination, just contribution of 40 years.

  • 87
  • 1
  • test

Image of AAVL
09-09-2014, 20:05
AAVL (guest)

am now 54 previously plumber and ran with 50 kg the ladder now I sit daily in the ground for my work I had surgery on my back two years hernia {} do as well as possible with my work minor limitations when can I do with my pension still hope eigelijk earlier as 67 so that I’m in the creases lie there also can enjoy, but as I see everything I lie flat

  • 76
  • 1
  • test

Image of Sjaak
09-09-2014, 20:05
Sjaak (guest)

I drnk as it involves the lives can be expected to easily put down people can not can not get to the doctor or zirkenhuis the stress eat more and more symptoms of heart attack or just want to be able not meerr dussssssssss

  • 52
  • 1
  • test

Image of Peter01
09-09-2014, 20:03
Peter01 (guest)

You think you can just old worden.Fout without worrying It is wasteful to the nits, in The Haag.Geven here and there billions .Whilst way you know whether it will stick to the fingers or, it may be that it goes to a Swiss bank or another dictator who weapons koopt..Geef therefore just that people eat and drink .In domestically elderly may not be older than 65 preferably before the pipe uit.scheelt again pay more state pension.

  • 55
  • 0
  • test

Image of Major
09-09-2014, 19:58
Major (guest)

With the current cuts in health care for the elderly is likely to increase to 67 not even necessary.

  • 62
  • 1
  • test

Image of N Rooster
09-09-2014, 19:57
N de Haan (guest)

In your 67 th job security is now reserved for the few. From 60 to give everyone the choice with a pension of around 1250 to stop working.

  • 43
  • 1
  • test

Image of John Es
09-09-2014, 19:55
John Ash (guest)

That sucks. I had hoped that I could work through. Until my 70th How do I go after my 67th without my fine colleagues.

  • 26
  • 8
  • test

Image of Peter Phantom
09-09-2014, 19:50
Phantom Peter

There’s more. been no work now Which is still decreasing. It is not better. Still worse. Financially, we go back so many years. Next year will only the rich are better off. Who pay less tax and achieve maximum return on their retirement. Politicians can easily work until 100 and earn millions with one or another fun side job queuing 1 time per month at a meeting. The rest can slog to those dead from fall down his 60th.

  • 49
  • 0
  • test

Image of Loeks
09-09-2014, 19:49
thunder cat

No one wants to work after his 65th birthday, NOBODY! Well, a bunch of show-offs in the Hague maybe. But ordinary, normal, hard-working laborers are absolutely fed on their 65th and longing for a few quiet years before they go out the pipe, if they have made it, at least for spring workers get 65 disagree. However, very cheap for our exploitative robber of that though! So, turning back those stupid measure, is also good against youth unemployment!

  • 64
  • 1
  • test

Image of Jobos
09-09-2014, 19:48
Jobos (guest)

The government has a bill are ready to raise the retirement age. The government should really fuck off with that bitch stories. Really quickly Let them think what they are doing and give youth a chance and the elderly life.

  • 49
  • 0
  • test

Image of -Robert
09-09-2014, 19:45
-Robert (guest)

We’re going to die earlier because we gradually death cut and reformed. Who will soon no longer has money can not live with this system. This type of predictions are only meant to see how they can nickel and dime us. More money off it is about getting money, not life.

  • 51
  • 0
  • test

Image of Hans Maastricht
09-09-2014, 19:44
Hans Maastricht (guest)

Obviously, .. because the increase to 67 is not even necessary and purely an economy measure dictated by bureaucrats in Brussels.

  • 40
  • 0
  • test

Image of stevan.nikolic.7121
09-09-2014, 19:43
stevan.nikolic.7121

if I am 60 years I can with hands clapping caused by health problems every little earlier everything was done as bad as lugging heavy boxes and asbestos remediation now back lung and broken

  • 31
  • 0
  • test

Image of Anneke
09-09-2014, 19:43
Anneke (guest)

Yes 1 europe greece in 55 years, not the same bpm and more business. Dutch only are we crazy enough to take everything for granted, see the excise duty. Long live Europe but I lie.

  • 48
  • 0
  • test

Image of -Robert
09-09-2014, 19:42
-Robert (guest)

That should still be very clairvoyant types if they can predict how old we are. However, if we look at the political policy, then we are going just before death, because we have no income and therefore no power to buy more. also the care is so broken that you problems will soon become impossible helped because this is not money. Want to see where it is going then you have the trend of policy by pulling the future and do not look at numbers and statistics.

  • 18
  • 0
  • test

Image of piet122
09-09-2014, 19:41
piet122 (guest)

The people were getting older because they could stop work and relax. around their 60th The next and the next generation will die before because they work longer and that produces stress, whether you performed physical labor or work with your haircut, even that is not always easy, people forget that well agree. Let people make place for the young, as they remain unemployed until their 40th and then they are too old to work. What are they doing in the Hague?

  • 34
  • 0
  • test

Image of William triumph.
09-09-2014, 19:30
William triumph. (Guest)

Wake up in The Hague, there is less and less work by our lovely invention of the computer, so no increase in the retirement age, but a reduction, the young people can get to work, or part-time work.

  • 89
  • LikeTweet

No comments:

Post a Comment