That concludes supervisor Authority Consumer & Market (ACM) after the investigation at the request of RailGood, the belangenvertegenwoordiger of freight transport companies.
The Bridge was in april a few days close for rail traffic after the defects in the track were detected.
Prorail would be great spoorvervoerders as NS reizigers and DB Cargo more and have previously involved in the decision to build the bridge to close than the other carriers. Thus had the great spoorvervoerders a lead on smaller parties in the search for alternatives.
No claim
The judgment is for the parties according to the ACM of interest with any submission of a claim for damages. According to Locon will be so big, not walk and get the involved parties together in “normal consultation”. Of a claim, according to a spokesman no question.
Also, RFF expects a “constructive” conversation with Prorail and trust in the future that the spoorwegbeheerder “infrastructural disruption” in the correct procedures will follow.
Compensation
Prorail says affected providers of cargo rail transportation all now a compensation offer. Some of the parties are, according to a spokesperson already compensated. Other parties are still dealing with the damage to calculate. About the amount of compensation did Prorail is no judgment.
Prorail promised further parties be able to better engage in decision-making for such problems.
No comments:
Post a Comment